MAVD LLC

Landlord profile

Filed as MAVD LLC · taxpayer 32045447524 · on the county rolls as MAVD LLC · mail to 7030 MISTY RIDGE DR CONVERSE TX 78109Matched to a Texas filing

$1,413,210Market value

6Properties

3,270Sq ft living area

≈5Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

6parcels on the rolls

5 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈5units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,413,210total market value

County roll value across all 6 parcels

$151,185median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 6
ZIPs: 78202, 78203
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 6
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 6
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 17198
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 15288

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: MAVD LLC
Name we searched: MAVD LLC
Taxpayer number: 32045447524
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2011-10-29
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0801500218
Registered agent: ANGEL BUENO
Filing mailing address: 7030 MISTY RIDGE DR CONVERSE TX 78109

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 5 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

6 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000106207	120 N MESQUITE ST SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$674,710	0	not on the roll	15288
000000106194	125 N MESQUITE LN SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$237,320	0	not on the roll	15288
000000115395	2441 E COMMERCE ST SAN ANTONIO 78203	bexar	$162,290	1,120	1938	17198
000000377149	1728 N CENTER SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$140,080	684	1945	17198
000000385316	926 CANTON SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$108,130	816	1929	17198
000000371756	162 ORPHAN SAN ANTONIO 78202	bexar	$90,680	650	1947	17198
6 properties			$1,413,210	3,270

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Member: YVETTE BUENO

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered