LARA JOSE G ROSALBA E

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as LARA JOSE G ROSALBA E · mail to 1035 MCCONNEL RD SOMERSET TX 78069No Texas filing under this name

$3,053,847Market value

15Properties

14,817Sq ft living area

≈14Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

15parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈14units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$3,053,847total market value

County roll value across all 15 parcels

$142,910median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Atascosa 10, Bexar 5
ZIPs: 78052, 78064, 78065, 78069, 78242, 78245
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 15
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 1 of 15
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 19807
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 13627

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

15 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000060734	1035 MCCONNELL RD LYTLE 78052	atascosa	$1,169,700	6,113	2006	13637
000000026389	540 BOX HOUSE RD LYTLE 78052	atascosa	$384,650	3,173	1997	19170
000000690473	2115 SEVEN PINES ST SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$204,424	1,488	1972	16503
000000341254	2230 MUDDY PEAK DR SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$196,195	1,559	1988	15624
000000210282	508 PR MILAGRO LN POTEET 78065 78065	atascosa	$181,800	0	not on the roll	19807
000000200973	PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$177,930	0	not on the roll	17653
000000690472	2111 SEVEN PINES ST SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$175,309	1,548	1972	14683
000000210059	MC CONNELL RD PLEASANTON 78065	atascosa	$142,910	0	not on the roll	18501
000000043906	252 QUAIL CREEK DR LYTLE 78052	atascosa	$130,000	0	not on the roll	18234
000000571924	6207 ROSE VALLEY DR SAN ANTONIO 78242	bexar	$127,285	936	1969	13943
000000200974	PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$56,870	0	not on the roll	17653
000000043898	MC CONNELL RD PLEASANTON 78052	atascosa	$42,090	0	not on the roll	18501
000000187230	FM 2790 SOMERSET 78069	bexar	$40,684	0	not on the roll	13627
000000206843	MC CONNELL RD CHARLOTTE TEXAS 78065	atascosa	$15,590	0	not on the roll	18047
000000206844	MC CONNELL RD CHARLOTTE TEXAS 78065	atascosa	$8,410	0	not on the roll	18047
15 properties			$3,053,847	14,817

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered