Landlord profile

Kbcb Investments Llc

Filed as KBCB INVESTMENTS LLC · taxpayer 32051957820 · on the county rolls as KBCB INVESTMENTS LLC · mail to 3805 LOST OASIS HOLLOW AUSTIN TX 78739Matched to a Texas filing
$6,204,594Market value
13Properties
46,897Sq ft living area
≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

13parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$6,204,594total market value

County roll value across all 13 parcels

$246,843median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Caldwell 11, Comal 1, Guadalupe 1
ZIPs
78132, 78154, 78644
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 13
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 13
Most recent purchase date on the roll
19402
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17924

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
KBCB INVESTMENTS LLC
Name we searched
KBCB INVESTMENTS LLC
Taxpayer number
32051957820
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2013-09-12
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0801848528
Registered agent
JAMES KENT BLACK
Filing mailing address
PO BOX 1079 LOCKHART TX 78644

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

13 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000038478430 MTN LAUREL DR NEW BRAUNFELS 78132comal$2,322,4716,160018817
000000017013215 N MAIN ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$892,66012,485193017924
000000016964119 N MAIN ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$640,22011,405017924
000000020265797 VOGEL DR LOCKHART 78644caldwell$626,8103,561018584
000000017009119 W WALNUT ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$569,2902,382018821
000000016997204 N MAIN ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$311,8205,600017924
000000045006808 MITCHELL AVE SCHERTZ 78154guadalupe$246,8432,034197019402
000000017012221 N MAIN ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$235,3701,684017924
000000016998208 N MAIN ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$232,7201,586190017924
000000016999107 E WALNUT ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$62,7300not on the roll17924
000000017010N CHURCH ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$51,2300not on the roll17924
000000020191S COLORADO ST LOCKHART 78644caldwell$11,6300not on the roll17924
000000034965N COLORADO AT CHINA LOCKHART 78644caldwell$8000not on the rollnot on the roll
13 properties$6,204,59446,897

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Manager
JAMES KENT BLACK

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered