Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

2 Palmer Trucking, L.L.C.

Filed as 2 PALMER TRUCKING, L.L.C. · taxpayer 18338206875 · on the county rolls as 2 PALM LLC · mail to 808 E PINE ST SEGUIN TX 78155Matched to a Texas filing
$3,719,645Market value
11Properties
25,191Sq ft living area
≈6Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

6 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈6units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$3,719,645total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$180,240median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Guadalupe 8, Wilson 3
ZIPs
78108, 78114, 78155, 78666
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll
19520
Earliest purchase date on the roll
15541

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
2 PALMER TRUCKING, L.L.C.
Name we searched
2 PALM LLC
Taxpayer number
18338206875
Right to transact business
FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
Secretary of State status
INACTIVE
Effective registration
2018-12-10
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0803184304
Registered agent
DEBERT PALMER
Filing mailing address
112 ARROYA DR POST TX 79356

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 6 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
0000001570981359 E COLLEGE SAN MARCOS 78666guadalupe$6,2160not on the rollnot on the roll
0000000596421363 E COLLEGE ST SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$32,2340not on the roll15541
000020139056B ST FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$70,6100not on the roll19520
000000059233STATE HWY 123 BYP SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$92,5010not on the roll17673
000020139057B ST FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$104,6000not on the roll19520
0000000251531029 C ST FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$180,2400not on the roll18544
0000000596441359 E COLLEGE ST SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$256,8845,000198415541
000000028102108 W CT ST SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$287,7372,240190517122
000000044575808 E PINE ST SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$295,8233,339015555
000000059234950 STATE HWY 123 BYP S SEGUIN 78155guadalupe$580,8007,500198817410
000000156721112 GULF ST CIBOLO 78108guadalupe$1,812,0007,112017009
11 properties$3,719,64525,191

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Manager
HEATH TOBE PALMER

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered