DILLINGHAM FAMILY VENTURE GROUP LLC

Landlord profile

Dillingham Family Venture Group Llc

Filed as DILLINGHAM FAMILY VENTURE GROUP LLC · taxpayer 32042256050 · on the county rolls as DILLINGHAM FAMILY VENTURES GROUP LLC · mail to 24075 ALPINE LODGE SAN ANTONIO TX 78258Matched to a Texas filing

$4,412,230Market value

10Properties

26,008Sq ft living area

≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$4,412,230total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$410,065median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 10
ZIPs: 78006, 78209, 78230, 78232, 78233, 78244, 78245, 78248, 78250, 78255
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 6 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 20262
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 19886

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: DILLINGHAM FAMILY VENTURE GROUP LLC
Name we searched: DILLINGHAM FAMILY VENTURES GROUP LLC
Taxpayer number: 32042256050
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2010-07-16
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0801294325
Registered agent: JEFFREY P DILLINGHAM
Filing mailing address: 24075 ALPINE LDG SAN ANTONIO TX 78258

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000698746	17123 FAWN BROOK DR SAN ANTONIO 78248	bexar	$717,000	4,096	1994	20160
000000365102	320 MUSTANG CIR HOLLYWOOD PARK 78232	bexar	$632,270	4,189	1968	20168
000000559828	7611 SHADY HOLLOW LN SAN ANTONIO 78255	bexar	$628,730	3,200	1984	20129
000001197237	9923 JON BOAT WY BOERNE 78006	bexar	$620,030	2,797	2014	20262
000000492594	315 ROYAL OAKS DR SAN ANTONIO 78209	bexar	$525,330	2,412	1956	20210
000000528751	3622 COLONY DR SAN ANTONIO 78230	bexar	$294,800	1,641	1968	20138
000000547097	12307 GRAN VISTA ST SAN ANTONIO 78233	bexar	$275,950	2,155	1974	19886
000000317846	7102 ELK TRL SAN ANTONIO 78244	bexar	$265,730	2,579	1984	20248
000000715369	9302 VALLEY HEDGE SAN ANTONIO 78250	bexar	$238,270	1,443	1985	20168
000000195366	9738 MISTY PLAIN DR SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$214,120	1,496	1996	20238
10 properties			$4,412,230	26,008

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

President: JEFFREY P DILLINGHAM

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered