Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Fox Investment Properties, Llc

Filed as FOX INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC · taxpayer 32041312862 · on the county rolls as FOX INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC · mail to 350 DRIPPING SPRINGS RANCH RD DRIPPING SPRINGS TX 78620Matched to a Texas filing
$7,140,459Market value
21Properties
4,765Sq ft living area
≈9Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

21parcels on the rolls

8 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈9units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$7,140,459total market value

County roll value across all 21 parcels

$25,540median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Comal 15, Bastrop 4, Travis 1, Hays 1
ZIPs
78133, 78602, 78620, 78741
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 21
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 21
Most recent purchase date on the roll
2012-10-12
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17955

Source: 4 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
FOX INVESTMENT PROPERTIES, LLC
Name we searched
FOX INVESTMENT PROPERTIES LLC
Taxpayer number
32041312862
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
2010-02-26
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0801235868
Registered agent
CHAD FOX
Filing mailing address
129 VALLEY RIDGE DR DRIPPING SPGS TX 78620

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 8 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

21 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000081125126 CONFERENCE DR BASTROP 78602bastrop$2,201,0160not on the roll18000
000000060903141 TAHITIAN DR BASTROP 78602bastrop$1,696,0130not on the roll18017
3208628721 RR 12 DRIPPING SPRINGS TX 78620hays$1,398,4301,246not on the rollnot on the roll
2901792214 METCALFE RD AUSTIN TX 78741travis$593,7182,07919782012-10-12
000000081523108 MAUNA KEA LN BASTROP 78602bastrop$450,6960not on the roll17955
000000055684386 VALLEY RDG CANYON LAKE 78133comal$192,9401,440198519118
000000055663624 VALLEY RDG CANYON LAKE 78133comal$159,4200not on the roll19095
0000000364491617 PINE ST BASTROP 78602bastrop$157,4560not on the roll19397
000000474673416 VALLEY RDG CANYON LAKE 78133comal$29,6200not on the roll19033
000000055665634 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$26,9200not on the roll19033
000000055682362 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$25,5400not on the rollnot on the roll
0000000556690 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$24,6200not on the rollnot on the roll
000000055661570 VALLEY RDG CANYON LAKE 78133comal$24,0700not on the roll19095
000000055688424 VALLEY RDG CANYON LAKE 78133comal$23,5200not on the roll19033
000000055689434 VALLEY RDG CANYON LAKE 78133comal$22,8300not on the roll19033
0000000556680 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$22,6600not on the rollnot on the roll
000000055666644 VALLEY RDG CANYON LAKE 78133comal$20,0100not on the roll19033
000000055683368 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$18,8200not on the rollnot on the roll
0000000556710 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$17,8400not on the rollnot on the roll
0000000556700 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$17,6700not on the rollnot on the roll
000000055681358 VALLEY RIDGE CANYON LAKE 78133comal$16,6500not on the rollnot on the roll
21 properties$7,140,4594,765

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Managing M
CHADWICK FOX
Member
SHANNON FOX

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered