LANDLORD MAPPER / OPEN AUSTIN
Landlord profile

Smile Parks Llc Series 225 Briggs

on the county rolls as SMILE PARKS LLC SERIES 225 BRIGGS · mail to PO BOX 1117 AUSTIN TX 78767No Texas filing under this name
$381,950Market value
10Properties
5,740Sq ft living area
≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$381,950total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$4,795median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 10
ZIPs
78211
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll
18943
Earliest purchase date on the roll
18943

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 10 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value ↓Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000479217225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$340,000756018943
000001441604225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$6,2208681978not on the roll
000001441599225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$5,3606721982not on the roll
000001441600225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$5,3606721978not on the roll
000001441601225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$4,9905601979not on the roll
000001441589225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$4,6004801974not on the roll
000001441595225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$4,0904201979not on the roll
000001441592225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$3,9504321977not on the roll
000001441598225 BRIGGS SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$3,8904201978not on the roll
000001441603225 BRIGGS ST SAN ANTONIO 78211bexar$3,4904601973not on the roll
10 properties$381,9505,740

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered