Landlord profile

Cft Nv Developments Llc

on the county rolls as CFT NV DEVELOPMENTS LLC · mail to 1120 N TOWN CENTER DR 150 LAS VEGAS NV 89144No Texas filing under this name
$19,524,373Market value
13Properties
5,216Sq ft living area
≈9Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

13parcels on the rolls

9 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈9units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$19,524,373total market value

County roll value across all 13 parcels

$1,711,440median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Bexar 7, Travis 3, Comal 2, Bastrop 1
ZIPs
78070, 78132, 78209, 78218, 78220, 78238, 78245, 78247, 78250, 78621, 78653, 78732, 78744
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
13 of 13
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 13
Most recent purchase date on the roll
2025-03-31
Earliest purchase date on the roll
16520

Source: 4 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 8 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

13 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
839277E WILLIAM CANNON DR AUSTIN TX 78744travis$146,780002025-03-31
000001440394W LOOP 1604 S SAN ANTONIO 78245bexar$512,7000not on the roll20117
0000012959472215 SE LOOP 410 SAN ANTONIO 78220bexar$563,0500not on the roll19905
0000001297981338 W US 290 ELGIN 78621bastrop$951,2300not on the roll17031
000000391817350 SINGING OAKS SPRING BRANCH 78070comal$1,407,7000not on the roll17305
9735667710 N F M RD 620 AUSTIN TX 78732travis$1,620,0002,2162020not on the roll
0000011304425707 MMONS SAN ANTONIO 78238bexar$1,711,4400not on the roll19122
0000004210641446 AUSTIN HWY SAN ANTONIO 78209bexar$1,736,6100not on the roll16520
0000003748692696 LOOP 337 NEW BRAUNFELS 78132comal$2,085,3200not on the roll19773
00000132031217907 OVERLOOK LOOP SAN ANTONIO 78247bexar$2,138,2700not on the roll18472
0000012736535758 WALZEM RD SAN ANTONIO 78218bexar$2,150,0000not on the roll17451
86081211808 RING DR AUSTIN TX 78653travis$2,181,2733,00020152015-06-12
0000013683057979 BANDERA RD SAN ANTONIO 78250bexar$2,320,0000not on the roll19086
13 properties$19,524,3735,216

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered