ANCIENT OAK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.

Landlord profile

Ancient Oak Real Estate Investment Company, L.L.C.

Filed as ANCIENT OAK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY, L.L.C. · taxpayer 32066539274 · on the county rolls as ANCIENT OAK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC · mail to 821 HIGH MEADOW PLEASANTON TX 78064Matched to a Texas filing

$1,097,420Market value

14Properties

16,261Sq ft living area

≈13Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

14parcels on the rolls

13 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈13units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,097,420total market value

County roll value across all 14 parcels

$85,035median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Atascosa 14
ZIPs: 78026, 78064, 78065
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 14
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 14
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 19891
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 17784

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: ANCIENT OAK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY, L.L.C.
Name we searched: ANCIENT OAK REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT COMPANY LLC
Taxpayer number: 32066539274
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2018-03-14
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0802961707
Registered agent: DANIEL S UECHI
Filing mailing address: 902 N MAIN ST PLEASANTON TX 78064

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 13 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

14 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000028470	902 N MAIN PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$143,160	2,280	1930	18047
000000030622	821 HIGH MEADOW DR PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$133,130	2,442	1977	18555
000000029266	813 N MAIN PLEASANTON TEXAS 78064	atascosa	$123,960	1,458	1940	17784
000000028969	819 MARTIN ST PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$118,350	1,509	1950	19891
000000029602	513 AUSTIN ST PLEASANTON TEXAS 78064	atascosa	$100,760	1,155	1960	17784
000000029869	715 HOUSTON ST PLEASANTON TEXAS 78064	atascosa	$96,330	1,325	1955	19256
000000029892	722 HOUSTON ST PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$94,270	1,003	1955	18852
000000058435	606 FOURTH ST JOURDANTON 78026	atascosa	$75,800	720	1970	19391
000000210465	FIRST ST PLEASANTON 78065	atascosa	$54,160	928	1940	18536
000000029796	821 MARKET ST PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$47,750	1,315	1950	19741
000000028328	733 PLEASANTON AVE PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$46,740	840	1960	18575
000000028877	426 VIRGINIA ST PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$37,640	558	1930	18442
000000217395	902 N MAIN PLEASANTON 78065	atascosa	$17,600	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000061763	701 E ADAMS ST PLEASANTON 78064	atascosa	$7,770	728	1985	19391
14 properties			$1,097,420	16,261

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Member: MARTHA BRYMER

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered