Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Xto Energy Inc.

Filed as XTO ENERGY INC. · taxpayer 17523477697 · on the county rolls as XTO ENERGY INC · mail to 22777 SPRINGWOODS VILLAGE PKWY SPRING TX 77389Matched to a Texas filing
$16,212,330Market value
12Properties
1,908Sq ft living area
≈1Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

12parcels on the rolls

1 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈1units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$16,212,330total market value

County roll value across all 12 parcels

$325,770median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Atascosa 12
ZIPs
77024, 78011, 78026, 78064, 78065
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 12
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 12
Most recent purchase date on the roll
17641
Earliest purchase date on the roll
17641

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
XTO ENERGY INC.
Name we searched
XTO ENERGY INC
Taxpayer number
17523477697
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
1991-04-19
State of formation
DE
Texas SOS file number
0008717506
Registered agent
CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSCLAWYERS INCO
Filing mailing address
22777 SPRINGWOODS VILLAGE PKWY STE 126 SPRING TX 77389

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

12 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000188188PLEASANTON 78011atascosa$00not on the rollnot on the roll
000000162154CHARLOTTE 78064atascosa$1,0200not on the rollnot on the roll
000000218013JOURDANTON 78026atascosa$10,1500not on the rollnot on the roll
000000078715PLEASANTON 78064atascosa$89,6300not on the rollnot on the roll
0000000109703500 FM 2924 KARNES CITY 78064atascosa$171,4401,908199017641
000000010969FM 2924 KARNES CITY 78064atascosa$264,0000not on the roll17641
000020518567PLEASANTON 77024atascosa$387,5400not on the rollnot on the roll
000000208934JOURDANTON 78011atascosa$409,5900not on the rollnot on the roll
000000017677CR 407 POTEET 78065atascosa$418,7500not on the roll17641
0000000178223500 FM 2924 JOURDANTON 78026atascosa$499,2000not on the roll17641
000000208937PLEASANTON 78011atascosa$644,0100not on the rollnot on the roll
000000217964JOURDANTON 78026atascosa$13,317,0000not on the rollnot on the roll
12 properties$16,212,3301,908

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Director
RICHARD E CANNON

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

One link was withheld. The registered agent on this filing, Corporation Service Company Dba Csclawyers Inco, appears on 248 other filings here. At that scale it is a hub, not a relationship, so it is reported as a count instead of drawn as lines

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered