HILLH PROPERTIES LLC

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as HILLH PROPERTIES LLC · mail to 9347 BIANCA SAN ANTONIO TX 78254No Texas filing under this name

$4,753,127Market value

11Properties

4,972Sq ft living area

≈9Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

4 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈9units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$4,753,127total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$174,800median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Medina 5, Bexar 3, Guadalupe 3
ZIPs: 78009, 78056, 78059, 78109, 78154, 78155, 78253, 78861
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 20110
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 17486

Source: 3 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 4 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↑	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000180942	CORDOVA RD SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$2,515	0	not on the roll	17486
000000059057	2385 ALTERNATE 90 SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$7,221	0	not on the roll	18389
000000514487	NATALIA 78059	medina	$29,580	0	not on the roll	20110
000001417638	TRAINER HALE RD SCHERTZ 78154	bexar	$35,830	0	not on the roll	19676
000000515021	CR 484 MICO 78056	medina	$152,280	0	not on the roll	20110
000000011506	FM 471 HONDO 78861	medina	$174,800	0	not on the roll	20110
000001417415	TRAINER HALE RD SCHERTZ 78154	bexar	$196,930	0	not on the roll	19676
000000011690	CASTROVILLE 78009	medina	$469,530	0	not on the roll	20110
000000513645	404 ABIGAIL ALLEY SAN ANTONIO 78253	medina	$939,830	4,972	2023	19653
000000059056	ALTERNATE 90 SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$1,182,401	0	not on the roll	18389
000001441559	W LOOP 1604 CONVERSE 78109	bexar	$1,562,210	0	not on the roll	20066
11 properties			$4,753,127	4,972

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered