PRNL RESIDENTIAL BUYER LLC

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as PRNL RESIDENTIAL BUYER LLC · mail to PO BOX 4090 SCOTTSDALE AZ 85261Our registry lookup was rejected

$2,249,851Market value

10Properties

17,633Sq ft living area

≈10Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

10parcels on the rolls

10 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈10units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$2,249,851total market value

County roll value across all 10 parcels

$216,778median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 9, Comal 1
ZIPs: 78132, 78244, 78245, 78250, 78253, 78254
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 10 of 10
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 10
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 20171
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 20171

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,597 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 9 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

10 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↑	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000326922	3758 CANDLEGLENN SAN ANTONIO 78244	bexar	$160,162	1,332	2004	20171
000001115840	3430 COPPER RIM SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$181,678	1,166	2009	20171
000000715438	9422 VALLEY ROCK SAN ANTONIO 78250	bexar	$183,264	1,252	1985	20171
000001227437	2631 BLF XING SAN ANTONIO 78244	bexar	$189,611	1,318	2016	20171
000000193985	2402 SUNVIEW LK SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$201,100	1,332	2005	20171
000000202038	11314 BRONZE SAND SAN ANTONIO 78253	bexar	$232,456	2,144	2001	20171
000000393733	6272 BEGONIA NEW BRAUNFELS 78132	comal	$249,953	1,432	2016	20171
000001052501	10132 BERMUDA TRCE SAN ANTONIO 78245	bexar	$255,922	2,580	2009	20171
000001126466	10803 CANTER SPUR SAN ANTONIO 78254	bexar	$292,572	2,177	2012	20171
000001060770	11214 SIERRA TRL SAN ANTONIO 78254	bexar	$303,133	2,900	2006	20171
10 properties			$2,249,851	17,633

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered