LEGACY FUNERAL HOLDINGS INC

Landlord profile

Legacy Funeral Holdings Inc

on the county rolls as LEGACY FUNERAL HOLDINGS INC · mail to 3103 SACKETT ST HOUSTON TX 77098Our registry lookup was rejected

$2,876,198Market value

8Properties

23,490Sq ft living area

≈5Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

8parcels on the rolls

5 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈5units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$2,876,198total market value

County roll value across all 8 parcels

$94,407median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Guadalupe 7, Bandera 1
ZIPs: 78055, 78130, 78154, 78155
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 8
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 8
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 19165
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 16453

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Our lookup for this name was rejected

The registry returned nothing usable for this name, because the query was malformed or unresolvable. That is our failure, not a statement that Texas has no record. Do not read this as the row above it: no finding was made here either way, and 7,605 owners in scope sit in this same state

This owner is in the lookup rejected state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 5 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

8 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000163519	1214 MULBERRY MEDINA 78055	bandera	$1,421,570	8,370	1987	18904
000000023032	1124 N AUSTIN ST SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$646,741	6,300	1972	19165
000000022698	713 N AUSTIN ST SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$501,893	8,820	0	16453
000000169370	2951 S STATE HWY 46 LULING 78130	guadalupe	$110,430	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000169369	713 N AUSTIN ST LULING 78130	guadalupe	$78,385	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000132422	1116 N AUSTIN ST SCHERTZ 78154	guadalupe	$59,913	0	not on the roll	not on the roll
000000022771	752 N RIVER ST SEGUIN 78155	guadalupe	$57,264	0	not on the roll	16453
000000056504	2951 HWY 46 S NEW BRAUNFELS 78130	guadalupe	$2	0	not on the roll	17549
8 properties			$2,876,198	23,490

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,386 owners of the 71,641 inside the coverage rules, 35.4% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,841 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,414 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,641 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered