ZAGA ENTERPRISES LLC

Landlord profile

Filed as ZAGA ENTERPRISES LLC · taxpayer 32061436799 · on the county rolls as ZAGA ENTERPRISES LLC · mail to 6107 VIA LA CANTERA 206 SAN ANTONIO TX 78256Matched to a Texas filing

$1,077,790Market value

11Properties

13,994Sq ft living area

≈14Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

11parcels on the rolls

11 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈14units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$1,077,790total market value

County roll value across all 11 parcels

$80,000median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Bexar 10, Kendall 1
ZIPs: 78218, 78257, 78624
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 11
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 0 of 11
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 19419
Earliest purchase date on the roll: 16997

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched: ZAGA ENTERPRISES LLC
Name we searched: ZAGA ENTERPRISES LLC
Taxpayer number: 32061436799
Right to transact business: ACTIVE
Secretary of State status: ACTIVE
Effective registration: 2016-08-30
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0802531879
Registered agent: JORGE A GAMBOA
Filing mailing address: 6107 VIA LA CANTERA APT 206 SAN ANTONIO TX 78256

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 11 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

11 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
000000342988	5625 WALZEM RD WINDCREST 78218	bexar	$308,580	3,666	2004	16997
000000256772	25226 PAT PKWY SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$100,000	1,274	2016	17165
000000256534	25107 ADA MAE ST SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$86,000	960	1986	18934
000000256615	25102 DANNA MARIE DR SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$85,000	1,120	1983	17395
000000256594	25315 LYNDA SUE DR SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$80,000	0	not on the roll	18978
000000256616	25106 DANNA MARIE DR SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$80,000	1,568	1997	19419
000000256780	25211 AUE RD SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$80,000	1,216	2002	17165
000000256686	25403 IMA RUTH PKWY SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$70,000	1,022	1971	17165
000000256720	24815 AUE RD SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$70,000	1,008	1979	18180
000000256592	25323 LYNDA SUE DR SAN ANTONIO 78257	bexar	$60,000	1,008	1973	17094
000000022370	407 JULY LN FREDERICKSBURG 78624	kendall	$58,210	1,152	2001	17165
11 properties			$1,077,790	13,994

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Director: JORGE A GAMBOA
Director: JORGE GAMBOA
Secretary: JORGE A GAMBOA

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered