ALBERICO VINCENT

Landlord profile

on the county rolls as ALBERICO VINCENT · mail to 611 ELLIOTT RANCH RD BUDA TX 78610No Texas filing under this name

$7,311,614Market value

16Properties

33,531Sq ft living area

≈36Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

16parcels on the rolls

16 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈36units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$7,311,614total market value

County roll value across all 16 parcels

$357,148median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread: Hays 15, Travis 1
ZIPs: 78610, 78640, 78652, 78737
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas: 0 of 16
Parcels flagged owner-occupied: 1 of 16
Most recent purchase date on the roll: 2019-02-21
Earliest purchase date on the roll: -715035

Source: 2 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Texas has no business filing under this name

The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. That is a finding. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here

This owner is in the no record state. The three states are different claims, and the method page gives the current count for each

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · 16 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

16 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel ID	Address	County	Market value ↓	Sq ft	Built	Acquired
76292	611 ELLIOTT RANCH RD BUDA TX 78610	hays	$1,987,440	5,440	2008	not on the roll
109435	653 OYR CRK BUDA TX 78610	hays	$516,452	2,833	2014	not on the roll
91919	141 CLIFTON MOORE ST BUDA TX 78610	hays	$404,583	1,880	2008	not on the roll
101665	791 MIDDLE CRK BUDA TX 78610	hays	$404,310	1,644	2010	not on the roll
98321	201 LAVENDER LN BUDA TX 78610	hays	$390,618	1,797	2011	not on the roll
111553	294 FOSSILSTONE TRL BUDA TX 78610	hays	$365,937	1,962	2014	not on the roll
107609	370 VERMILION MARBLE TRL BUDA TX 78610	hays	$362,677	2,097	2014	not on the roll
94728	333 LIMESTONE TRL AUSTIN TX 78737	hays	$358,360	1,920	2007	-718444
127160	169 MARTHA DR BUDA TX 78610	hays	$355,937	1,705	2017	-715035
113996	166 ADOQUIN TRL BUDA TX 78610	hays	$332,404	1,737	2015	not on the roll
127143	508 MARTHA DR BUDA TX 78610	hays	$328,016	1,488	2018	not on the roll
77697	120 CHRISTOPHER CV KYLE TX 78640	hays	$313,710	2,202	2000	not on the roll
761814	100 ASH TREE CT AUSTIN TX 78652	travis	$312,207	1,856	2011	2019-02-21
95205	506 HOT SPRING VLY BUDA TX 78610	hays	$294,188	1,818	2012	not on the roll
109701	437 VOYAGER CV KYLE TX 78640	hays	$293,091	1,476	2013	not on the roll
91655	2289 GREEN MEADOWS LN BUDA TX 78610	hays	$291,684	1,676	2007	-715066
16 properties			$7,311,614	33,531

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

Companies linked to this one

There is no network to draw yet. Linking one company to another needs a franchise filing on both ends, and this owner has no matched filing. The links this tool will draw are a shared officer, a shared registered agent, and a shared mailing address, in that order of strength

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered