Austin DSA · Housing Justice

Public records, put back in tenants' hands

Landlord profile

Boening Brothers Dairy, Inc.

Filed as BOENING BROTHERS DAIRY, INC. · taxpayer 17416677544 · on the county rolls as BOENING BROTHERS DAIRY INC · mail to 2438 CR 137 FLORESVILLE TX 78114Matched to a Texas filing
$5,296,519Market value
12Properties
10,345Sq ft living area
≈2Units estimated from floor area

The unit figure is the only estimate in that row: floor area divided by 900 square feet, so it is the third figure restated

Portfolio totals

12parcels on the rolls

2 of them are inside the registry lookup scope

≈2units, estimated

Floor area divided by 900 sq ft, not a count

$5,296,519total market value

County roll value across all 12 parcels

$206,100median parcel value

The middle parcel, which a total hides

County spread
Wilson 12
ZIPs
78113, 78114, 78160
Parcels whose tax bill leaves Texas
0 of 12
Parcels flagged owner-occupied
0 of 12
Most recent purchase date on the roll
9759
Earliest purchase date on the roll
11765

Source: 1 county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025 to 2026 · purchase dates are the roll's own recent-purchase field and are not reliable deed dates

Download this portfolio as CSV

The Texas business filing behind this name

Filing we matched
BOENING BROTHERS DAIRY, INC.
Name we searched
BOENING BROTHERS DAIRY INC
Taxpayer number
17416677544
Right to transact business
ACTIVE
Secretary of State status
ACTIVE
Effective registration
1970-06-12
State of formation
TX
Texas SOS file number
0027689300
Registered agent
SCOTT BOEING
Filing mailing address
2438 COUNTY ROAD 137 FLORESVILLE TX 78114

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 2 registry rows carry this owner

Every property on the rolls under this owner

12 parcels held by this owner, with size, age, acquisition date, and market value
Parcel IDAddressCountyMarket value Sq ftBuiltAcquired
000000016952CR 137 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$1,168,7902,9240not on the roll
000000016192FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$1,010,3204200not on the roll
000000015606FM 3161 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$857,30955219909759
000000015611675 CR 136 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$798,2700not on the roll12901
0000000166312440 CR 137 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$630,4502,9720not on the roll
000000016953CR 138 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$206,3300not on the roll9759
0000000179599970 FM 2505 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$205,8701,0361950not on the roll
000000016956CR 138 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$134,4100not on the roll11765
000000016958CR 138 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$134,4100not on the roll11765
0000000166222438 CR 137 FLORESVILLE 78114wilson$115,9102,4411964not on the roll
000000016639STOCKDALE 78160wilson$22,0700not on the rollnot on the roll
000000018001MC COY 78113wilson$12,3800not on the rollnot on the roll
12 properties$5,296,51910,345

Values are the county market value on the roll, not a sale price · roll year 2025 to 2026

The people who signed for the filing

Director
SCOTT BOENING

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · officer home addresses are in the filing and are not shown, and there is no search by person name here

Companies linked to this one

Nothing else in this data shares an officer, a registered agent, or a mailing address with this filing. That is a real answer about this owner, not a blank

Shared officer

The same person is named on both filings. This is the strongest link here, and the one worth naming out loud

Shared mailing address

Both filings collect mail at the same address. Suggestive, and worth a second look, but shared suites happen

Shared registered agent

Both hired the same filing service. Weakest line on the diagram, drawn faint on purpose: these firms sign for thousands of unrelated companies

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered