480 GREEN VALLEY DR BASTROP 78602

Ownership chain / 480 GREEN VALLEY DR BASTROP 78602

County appraisal roll

The property

Address: 480 GREEN VALLEY DR BASTROP 78602
Market value on the roll: $4,484
Living area: 840 sq ft
Parcel ID: 000008723723
Built: 1990
State class code: not on the roll
Legal description, as written on the roll: LAKE BASTROP ACRES SEC 4, BLOCK 17, LOT 6, (MH ONLY 14X60, S/N 181SB464S40239, L/N TEX0151062) LOCATED ON R25767

Roughly 1 units, and that is an estimate, not a count. The roll does not publish a unit count for most buildings, so this figure is the floor area divided by 900 square feet, corrected by class code only for houses and small duplex-to-fourplex classes. It is the same number as the living area above, divided. Treat it as a size band, not a fact

Source: bastrop county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · class not on the roll · owner-occupied flag: no · in the registry lookup scope: yes

County appraisal roll

The name on the roll

Owner of record: ORTIZ BAMA D CO JOSE JUAN BARTOLO GEMA BARBOZA
Where the tax bill is mailed: 118 S MOCKINGBIRD CIR CEDAR CREEK TX 78612

Source: bastrop county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · the roll lists no mailing address for the tax agent

Texas franchise tax registryNo record

Texas has no business filing under that name

Name we searchedORTIZ BAMA D CO JOSE JUAN BARTOLO GEMA BARBOZA

Filing we matchednone

This is a finding, not a miss. The registry answered, and the answer was that nothing is filed in Texas under this name. Plenty of rentals are held by a person under their own name, by a trust, or by an out-of-state company that never registered here. The chain stops on a hard bar because the search finished

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · searched and returned nothing · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Joined across 13 county rolls

What this landlord holds

ORTIZ BAMA D CO JOSE JUAN BARTOLO GEMA BARBOZA

$4,484Market value

1Properties

840Sq ft living area

≈1Units estimated

This is the only parcel on the rolls under this name and mailing address

See the landlord profile

Owner key: name plus mailing address, matched across the county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered