4906 BLANCO RD SAN ANTONIO 78212

Ownership chain / 4906 BLANCO RD SAN ANTONIO 78212

County appraisal roll

The property

Address: 4906 BLANCO RD SAN ANTONIO 78212
Market value on the roll: $1,825,000
Living area: 0 sq ft
Parcel ID: 000000447607
Built: not on the roll
Acquired: 19478
State class code: F1
Legal description, as written on the roll: NCB 9895 BLK 7 LOT 2 ,18 & 19 & NCB 11693 LOT NW IRR 123.65 FT OF 17 & N IRR 193.20 FT OF M 2016- MERGE 447607 & 489701 PER APPRAISER CR #35627; 2015- RESURVEY/MAP & LEGAL UPDATE PER DEED 16974/1198; 2014-NEW RMS PER MERGE PER CR 30845, MERGER OF 447590 INTO 447607 SEE DELETE ACCT 447590. JPR/GIS/09-30-13

Roughly 1 units, and that is an estimate, not a count. The roll does not publish a unit count for most buildings, so this figure is the floor area divided by 900 square feet, corrected by class code only for houses and small duplex-to-fourplex classes. It is the same number as the living area above, divided. Treat it as a size band, not a fact

Source: bexar county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · class F1 · owner-occupied flag: no · in the registry lookup scope: yes

County appraisal roll

The name on the roll

Owner of record: NNN REIT LP
Where the tax bill is mailed: 450 S ORANGE AVE 900 ORLANDO FL 32801
Tax agent of record: RYAN LLC

The building is here. The tax bill goes out of state. That gap between where a property sits and where its mail lands is often the first sign you are dealing with an investor and not a neighbor

Source: bexar county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · the roll lists no mailing address for the tax agent

Texas franchise tax registryLookup rejected

Our lookup was rejected

The registry rejected our lookup for this name and returned nothing usable. That is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed under the name. We do not know whether this name has a Texas filing, so the chain trails off dashed and open. Do not read it as a clean record, and do not read it as an absence either

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · no usable answer on file · reload this page later to pick up the answer

Joined across 13 county rolls

What this landlord holds

NNN REIT LP

$169,263,108Market value

64Properties

170,552Sq ft living area

≈35Units estimated

This building is one of 64 held under the same name and mailing address on the rolls

See the landlord profile

Owner key: name plus mailing address, matched across the county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered