2585 THOUSAND OAKS DR SAN ANTONIO 78232

Ownership chain / 2585 THOUSAND OAKS DR SAN ANTONIO 78232

County appraisal roll

The property

Address: 2585 THOUSAND OAKS DR SAN ANTONIO 78232
Market value on the roll: $1,131,237
Living area: 0 sq ft
Parcel ID: 000000628596
Built: not on the roll
Acquired: 12089
State class code: F1
Legal description, as written on the roll: NCB: 15676 BLK: 25 LOT: 3 (1000 OAKS PLACE) & P-3 ABS 812 NCB: 16801 LOT: 54 RAINBOW GARDENS SUBD 2013-RMS PER MERGE PER CR 29551, ACCTS 586631 & 586516 WAS MERGED INTO ACCT 628596 TO TOTAL 6.9750 AC. JPR.GIS.04-08-13

Roughly 1 units, and that is an estimate, not a count. The roll does not publish a unit count for most buildings, so this figure is the floor area divided by 900 square feet, corrected by class code only for houses and small duplex-to-fourplex classes. It is the same number as the living area above, divided. Treat it as a size band, not a fact

Source: bexar county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · class F1 · owner-occupied flag: no · in the registry lookup scope: yes

County appraisal roll

The name on the roll

Owner of record: ARCO IRIS LTD
Where the tax bill is mailed: 2585 THOUSAND OAKS DR SAN ANTONIO TX 78232
Tax agent of record: ARTHUR P VELTMAN ASSOCIATES

Source: bexar county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · the roll lists no mailing address for the tax agent

Texas franchise tax registryMatched

The business filing behind that name

Name we searchedARCO IRIS LTD

Filing we matchedARCO IRIS INC

Taxpayer number: 17421039631
Right to transact business: FRANCHISE TAX ENDED
Secretary of State status: INACTIVE
Effective registration: 1980-05-07
State of formation: TX
Texas SOS file number: 0051852800
Filing mailing address: 7101 WURZBACH RD SAN ANTONIO TX 78240

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 1 registry rows carry this owner

Texas franchise tax registry

The filing names no officers

The registry returned the company but listed no officers or directors under it. The registered agent below is a hired filing service, not an owner, so it is not a name to hold responsible

Registered agent: CONSTANCE R LIVINGSTON

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · no officer rows returned for this filing

Joined across 13 county rolls

What this landlord holds

ARCO IRIS INC

$1,131,237Market value

1Properties

0Sq ft living area

≈1Units estimated

This is the only parcel on the rolls under this name and mailing address

See the landlord profile

Owner key: name plus mailing address, matched across the county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered