KYLE SEALE PKWY SAN ANTONIO 78255

Ownership chain / KYLE SEALE PKWY SAN ANTONIO 78255

County appraisal roll

The property

Address: KYLE SEALE PKWY SAN ANTONIO 78255
Market value on the roll: $3,841,930
Living area: 0 sq ft
Parcel ID: 000001013714
Built: not on the roll
Acquired: 20119
State class code: E1
Legal description, as written on the roll: CB 4565 P-3A (17.5255), P-3B(.552), P-3C (11.14), CB 4547 P-1A (3.84), CB 4549 P-1E (20.803), P-4 (45.8693),CB 4552 P-2J (17.8682) 2023 SPLIT PER DEED 20220018757 FILED 1-24-22 CR 55755. JA/GIS/8-18-22 2007 REMAINS PER SPLIT PER DEED 12173/1454 EXE 6-1-06.

Roughly 1 units, and that is an estimate, not a count. The roll does not publish a unit count for most buildings, so this figure is the floor area divided by 900 square feet, corrected by class code only for houses and small duplex-to-fourplex classes. It is the same number as the living area above, divided. Treat it as a size band, not a fact

Source: bexar county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · class E1 · owner-occupied flag: no · in the registry lookup scope: yes

County appraisal roll

The name on the roll

Owner of record: SONOMA VERDE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC
Where the tax bill is mailed: 860 JOHNSON FERRY RD 140123 ATLANTA GA 30328

The building is here. The tax bill goes out of state. That gap between where a property sits and where its mail lands is often the first sign you are dealing with an investor and not a neighbor

Source: bexar county appraisal roll · roll year 2025 · the roll lists no mailing address for the tax agent

Texas franchise tax registryMatched

The business filing behind that name

Name we searchedSONOMA VERDE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC

Filing we matchedSONOMA VERDE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC

Taxpayer number: 32095261569
Right to transact business: FORFEITED
Secretary of State status: NOT REGISTERED
Effective registration: NOT REGISTERED
State of formation: GA
Texas SOS file number: NOT REGISTERED
Filing mailing address: 2870 PEACHTREE RD NW ATLANTA GA 30305

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · matched on the owner name as printed on the roll · 2 registry rows carry this owner

Texas franchise tax registry

The filing names no officers

The registry returned the company but listed no officers or directors under it. The registered agent below is a hired filing service, not an owner, so it is not a name to hold responsible

Registered agent: CORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSCLAWYERS INCO

Source: Texas Comptroller franchise tax registry · no officer rows returned for this filing

Joined across 13 county rolls

What this landlord holds

SONOMA VERDE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS LLC

$5,581,520Market value

2Properties

0Sq ft living area

≈2Units estimated

This building is one of 2 held under the same name and mailing address on the rolls

See the landlord profile

Owner key: name plus mailing address, matched across the county appraisal rolls · roll year 2025

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered