The biggest
landlords here

Ranked by what they hold inside the registry lookup scope. A row's parcel count is its in-scope parcels, not everything it owns, and the column beside it shows the difference

Rank by

Total market value · Estimated units · Parcels in scope

Nothing selected means every roll loaded
Comma separated. This is the building's ZIP, not the owner's mailing ZIP
Units, estimated
Market value
Year built
The whole roll includes owner-occupied homes and takes a few seconds to scan
Used by the rankings table only

71,735 owners match — out of the 71,735 owners holding at least one in-scope parcel. No filters applied, so this is the whole population

Those 71,735 owners hold 147,384 in-scope parcels worth $203,329,346,149 on the roll between them, out of 71,735 owners with any in-scope parcel and 1,669,326 distinct owners on the whole roll. Ranking is over in-scope parcels only, so the owner-occupied half of the roll is not in this table

Owners ranked by estimated units over in-scope parcels
#Owner on the rollParcels in scopeAll parcels on the rollsUnits, estimatedMarket value in scopeCountiesRegistered agentRegistry
361LOYOLA JUNCTION LLC11≈363$15,089,656Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
362OAKS ON BANDERA LLC66≈363$34,455,710BexarGILBERTO VERGARA JRMatched
363CHIMNEY QUARRY TOWNHOMES LLC ETAL HAMILTON ZANZE CO22≈362$34,000,100BexarC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
364AGR APARTMENTS LLC11≈361$86,560,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
365HARDY OAKS APARTMENTS LLC ET AL BRIAN S WEINHART ESQ11≈361$54,000,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
366SHLP SETTLERS RIDGE LLC11≈360$68,784,929Travisnot on the filingNo record
367MHO SAN ANTONIO INVESTCO LLC11≈359$66,000,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
368SFR JV20191 BORROWER LLC TRICON AMERICAN HOMES LLC359359≈359$82,092,432Bexar, Comal, Guadalupenot on the filingNo record
369SL2 BOWEN DOMAIN LP11≈359$125,000,000Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
370SREIT GRAND DOMINION LLC CO RYANLLC11≈359$57,600,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
371VAUGHAN ATX LLC11≈359$75,950,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
372ARTESIA AT MEDINA VALLEY LLC11≈358$50,327,030BexarDOAK D BROWNMatched
373CH MF BTH IIAUSTIN WALLER11≈358$106,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
374SHLP RIDGEVIEW APARTMENTS LLC11≈357$59,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
375ACC OUTPOST SAN ANTONIOLP ACC MANAGEMENT11≈356$46,000,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
376SHELBY RANCH INVESTMENT LP12≈356$60,000,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
377FBCC CITYPOINT LP22≈355$45,637,565TravisCARY S KRIERMatched
378REMINGTON C F HOUSE ASSOCIATES11≈355$33,500,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
379ST ELMO APTS LP LLC11≈355$80,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
3804032 SCROSS LLC11≈354$18,900,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
381AZURE SUGARLAND LP 11≈354$61,690,000TravisNATIONAL REGIRED AGENTS INCMatched
382BOULTON PROPERTIES LLC CO RITHM CAPITAL353368≈353$97,018,287Bexar, Comalnot on the filingNo record
383CRPMAPPLE ALAMO HEIGHTS OWNER LP11≈353$60,574,571Bexarnot on the filingNo record
384EWR SANW APARETMENTS LLC11≈353$62,000,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
385MAC HIDDEN MEADOWS LLC88≈353$31,614,490BexarMANUEL CRUZMatched
386PRADERA SFR LLC MARK S WOLF11≈353$58,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
387TACARA STONE OAK MAR LLC11≈353$63,100,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
3881703 N LOOP 1604 W LLC CO GVA PRO LLC11≈352$49,000,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
389JWCM REPUBLIC ALAMO HEIGHTS DST11≈352$43,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
390RIM MULTIFAMILY PARTNERS LP11≈352$67,500,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
391SAN ANTONIO HOUSING AUTHORITY11289≈352$29,750,542Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
392CR SAN MIGUEL COMMIES LLC COLRICH11≈350$47,000,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
393LOOKOUT HOLLOW CONSOLIDATED LLC22≈350$52,500,000BexarMICHELLE J SNEDDENMatched
394UNIVERSITY VILLAGE APARTMENTS PHASE 1 LP CO SCHUMACHER INC11≈349$61,000,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
395GREYSTONE BRIDGE BARRINGTON LLC11≈348$23,000,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
396PASSCO LAKEVIEW VILLAS DST11≈348$35,998,780Comalnot on the filingNot looked up
397CLPFLANTANA RIDGE LP11≈347$73,970,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
398COLONIAL REALTY L P11≈347$56,975,000TravisJOSEPH S COMEAUXMatched
399SIENNA AT WOVER JV LP11≈347$38,000,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
400KARLIN PARMER 91 LLC11≈346$79,200,000Travisnot on the filingNo record

Unit counts are estimated from floor area · market value is the county roll value, not a sale price · the registry column is the owner's state, and a rejected lookup is not the same claim as no Texas filing · the table stops at the top 1,000 of 71,735; the CSV carries the rest

PreviousPage 10 of 25 · showing 1,000 of 71,735 ownersNext

Download this ranking as CSV

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered