LANDLORD MAPPER / OPEN AUSTIN

The biggest
landlords here

Ranked by what they hold inside the registry lookup scope. A row's parcel count is its in-scope parcels, not everything it owns, and the column beside it shows the difference

Rank by

Total market value · Estimated units · Parcels in scope

Nothing selected means every roll loaded
Comma separated. This is the building's ZIP, not the owner's mailing ZIP
Units, estimated
Market value
Year built
The whole roll includes owner-occupied homes and takes a few seconds to scan
Used by the rankings table only
ClearDownload this as CSV

71,570 owners match — out of the 71,570 owners holding at least one in-scope parcel. No filters applied, so this is the whole population

Those 71,570 owners hold 147,384 in-scope parcels worth $203,329,346,149 on the roll between them, out of 71,570 owners with any in-scope parcel and 1,669,160 distinct owners on the whole roll. Ranking is over in-scope parcels only, so the owner-occupied half of the roll is not in this table

Owners ranked by total market value over in-scope parcels
#Owner on the rollParcels in scopeAll parcels on the rollsUnits, estimatedMarket value in scopeCountiesRegistered agentRegistry
561GI XI RITTIMAN INDUSTRIAL LP1212≈12$59,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
562HILLTOP SH VENTURE TX LP11≈198$59,460,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
563WATERS AT BLUFF SPRINGS LLC11≈266$59,325,352Travisnot on the filingNo record
564JACKSON APARTMENTS SA LLC33≈698$59,250,000BexarCOGENCY GLOBAL INCMatched
565AVOCET 336 LLC11≈373$59,000,000BexarCOGENCY GLOBAL INCMatched
566SHLP RIDGEVIEW APARTMENTS LLC11≈357$59,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
567TRADEHOUSE AT BULVEREDE MARKETPL LP SUN HOLDINGS GROUP11≈313$59,000,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
568IGFB PARMER PLACE OWNER LLC11≈369$58,960,000TravisCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS INCOMatched
569BAINBRIDGEGOPHER CREEKSIDE OWNER LP11≈321$58,755,370Comalnot on the filingNo record
570CPT AUSTIN EAST 6TH LP11≈197$58,700,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
571507 PRESSLER LTD22≈198$58,581,998TravisPETER A LAMYMatched
572OHT GRANDVIEW LLC OHT PARTNERS LLC11≈199$58,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
573PRADERA SFR LLC MARK S WOLF11≈353$58,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
574RAR2AXIS WEST CAMPUS LP11≈209$58,500,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
575WORLD SAVINGS LOAN ASSOC FSBWORLD MRTG CO WACHOVIA CORP PRO TAX PROCESSING NC034011≈1$58,500,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
576DRURY SW INC1115≈11$58,432,220Bexarnot on the filingNo record
577BEL ELAN LLC11≈207$58,410,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
578MUELLER R G JR PARTNERSHIP LP12≈191$58,350,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
579DOMAIN FALCONHEAD APARTMENTS LLC11≈272$58,160,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
580FERGO PROPERTIES INCORPORATED1721≈17$58,103,300Atascosa, Bexar, ComalERNESTO GOMEZMatched
581PGF GROUP LLC 90149≈106$58,035,835Atascosa, Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, Kendall, Medina, TravisNOE RANGELMatched
582502 NORTH LLC22≈370$58,000,000TravisJAMES R GATLINMatched
583EMIF FIREWHEEL LP11≈385$58,000,000BexarC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
584FSC HIGHLANDS ASSOCIATES LLC11≈278$58,000,000Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
585PASSCO SAN ANTONIO DST11≈320$58,000,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
586ED SERVICES AUTOMOBILE ASSOC11≈1$57,974,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
587DOMICILIO OC LLC77≈7$57,800,000BexarCAPITOL CORPORATE SERVICES INCMatched
588FKH SFR PROPCO K LP216219≈216$57,797,293Atascosa, Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, Kendall, Medina, Wilsonnot on the filingLookup rejected
589C5LC AT IH 10 LLC CORE5 INDUSTRIAL PARTNERS LLC66≈6$57,772,710Bexarnot on the filingNo record
590NWOODS CENTER INC44≈4$57,752,629Bexarnot on the filingNo record
591AMLI RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES LP11≈282$57,750,111Travisnot on the filingNo record
592MACK LLC22≈467$57,750,000BexarORTEGA CRISTOBALMatched
593VELOCIS WILDHORN SAINT MARY SPE LP11≈267$57,630,000Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
594SREIT GRAND DOMINION LLC CO RYANLLC11≈359$57,600,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
595CLEMAR PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLC1010≈10$57,588,970BexarCLEMENT MARCUSMatched
596ET13 LP250250≈250$57,519,236Bexar, Comal, Williamsonnot on the filingNo record
597INTERNATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE1626≈20$57,511,134Bexar, Comal, Williamsonnot on the filingNo record
598DELTA MAIN DWYER LLC11≈254$57,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
599MDC COAST 10 LLC2627≈26$57,477,417Atascosa, Bexar, Comal, GuadalupeCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANYMatched
600NORTHLAND GREAT HILLS II LLC11≈286$57,370,000Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected

Unit counts are estimated from floor area · market value is the county roll value, not a sale price · the registry column is the owner's state, and a rejected lookup is not the same claim as no Texas filing · the table stops at the top 1,000 of 71,570; the CSV carries the rest

PreviousPage 15 of 25 · showing 1,000 of 71,570 ownersNext

Download this ranking as CSV

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered