The biggest
landlords here

Ranked by what they hold inside the registry lookup scope. A row's parcel count is its in-scope parcels, not everything it owns, and the column beside it shows the difference

Rank by

Total market value · Estimated units · Parcels in scope

Nothing selected means every roll loaded
Comma separated. This is the building's ZIP, not the owner's mailing ZIP
Units, estimated
Market value
Year built
The whole roll includes owner-occupied homes and takes a few seconds to scan
Used by the rankings table only

71,735 owners match — out of the 71,735 owners holding at least one in-scope parcel. No filters applied, so this is the whole population

Those 71,735 owners hold 147,384 in-scope parcels worth $203,329,346,149 on the roll between them, out of 71,735 owners with any in-scope parcel and 1,669,326 distinct owners on the whole roll. Ranking is over in-scope parcels only, so the owner-occupied half of the roll is not in this table

Owners ranked by total market value over in-scope parcels
#Owner on the rollParcels in scopeAll parcels on the rollsUnits, estimatedMarket value in scopeCountiesRegistered agentRegistry
761PROSE RIM II VENTURE LP11≈386$49,000,000BexarCT CORPORATION SYMMatched
762SAN ANTONIO CITADEL OWNER LLC11≈1$49,000,000BexarC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
763NP BGO FOR COMMERCE N LLC49≈4$48,939,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
764AHFC VILLA DEL REY99≈213$48,910,054TravisMANDY DEMAYOMatched
765ALAMO CONCRETE PRODUCTS LTD1642≈21$48,905,640Bastrop, Bexar, Comal, MedinaKIRK E TAYLORMatched
766NR TACARA AT STEINER RANCH LLC11≈262$48,800,000TravisCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS INCOMatched
767APG TEXAS 1 LP ATTN EVAN ZUCKER33≈3$48,796,450Comal, Guadalupenot on the filingNo record
768TPIARBORETUM LTD11≈196$48,660,618Travisnot on the filingNo record
769NICHOLS PARK TFP LTD44≈372$48,571,832Bexar, TravisJ P NEWMANMatched
770PROSE NEW BRAUNFELS OWNER LLC56≈5$48,345,350ComalC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
771TX PARMER AUSTIN CCF LP45≈459$48,330,000Bexar, TravisJOHN C SHACKELFORDMatched
772KIPP TEXAS INC12≈1$48,296,830BexarSEHBA ALIMatched
773DOMAIN NORTHSIDE OFFICE11≈140$48,295,040Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
774DRE TXCO LLC BRYAN CAVE LEIGHTON PAISNER55≈5$48,190,240Bexarnot on the filingNo record
775GABLES OF CENTRAL PARK11≈286$48,184,127Travisnot on the filingNo record
776METHODIST HEALTHCARE MINISTRIES OF S TEXAS INC812≈8$48,153,234Bexarnot on the filingNo record
777801 LTD1925≈146$48,150,968Bastrop, Bexar, Travis, WilliamsonBURLINGTON VENTURES INCMatched
778MFREVF III DOUBLE CREEK LP11≈270$48,030,000Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
779TEACHERS INSURANCE ANNUITY11≈222$48,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
780TERRAZZO APARTMENT HOMES LP11≈232$48,000,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
781VERANDA APARTMENTS LP11≈344$47,993,319TravisINCORPORATING SERVICES LTDMatched
782TAP PALISADES PARK LLC33≈763$47,917,850BexarCT CORPORATION SYMMatched
783SILVERLEAF RESORTS INC ATTN FINANCIAL SERVICES GROUP727≈7$47,901,100Comalnot on the filingLookup rejected
784RESERVE AT CANYON CREEK TIC 1 LLC CO THE CONNOR GROUP11≈369$47,900,000BexarCOGENCY GLOBAL INCMatched
785TOWNHOLLOW APARTMENTS LLC4343≈288$47,841,930TravisREGIRED AGENTS INCMatched
786KIEFER RD COLD STORAGE INVESTORS LLC11≈1$47,750,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
787WESTLAKE AUSTIN HOLDCO LP11≈225$47,750,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
788JPMORGAN CHASE BANK46≈4$47,565,480Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
789OXFORD TECH RIDGE APARTMENTS LLC22≈248$47,555,000Bexar, TravisJUSTIN SWARTZMatched
790BES WATER OAK FUND XIV LLC ETAL11≈277$47,500,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
791BLVD AT SONTERRA OWNER LLC KAIROI RESIDENTAL11≈339$47,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
792CWS DOMINION LP ETAL11≈281$47,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
793PHT WOVER HILLS MOB I LLC ENDURA ADVISORY GROUP33≈3$47,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
794WPTE OAKS APARTMENTS LTD11≈326$47,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
795PPF AMLI 300 NORTH LAMAR BLVD LLC11≈166$47,480,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
796HTS SAN ANTONIO LP22≈2$47,465,210Bexarnot on the filingNo record
797RANGER SATX LP DRA ADVISORS LLC66≈6$47,450,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
798FAIRHAVEN LLC23≈231$47,432,800Bexar, KendallDEBORAH L SAKULENZKIMatched
799FKH SFR PROPCO I LP166167≈166$47,254,101Bexar, Comal, Guadalupenot on the filingLookup rejected
800FC SUMMIT RIDGE LP259316≈340$47,246,864Bexar, Comal, Hays, WilliamsonNATIONAL REGIRED AGENTS INCMatched

Unit counts are estimated from floor area · market value is the county roll value, not a sale price · the registry column is the owner's state, and a rejected lookup is not the same claim as no Texas filing · the table stops at the top 1,000 of 71,735; the CSV carries the rest

PreviousPage 20 of 25 · showing 1,000 of 71,735 ownersNext

Download this ranking as CSV

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,455 owners of the 71,735 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,870 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,410 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,735 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered