LANDLORD MAPPER / OPEN AUSTIN

The biggest
landlords here

Ranked by what they hold inside the registry lookup scope. A row's parcel count is its in-scope parcels, not everything it owns, and the column beside it shows the difference

Rank by

Total market value · Estimated units · Parcels in scope

Nothing selected means every roll loaded
Comma separated. This is the building's ZIP, not the owner's mailing ZIP
Units, estimated
Market value
Year built
The whole roll includes owner-occupied homes and takes a few seconds to scan
Used by the rankings table only
ClearDownload this as CSV

71,641 owners match — out of the 71,641 owners holding at least one in-scope parcel. No filters applied, so this is the whole population

Those 71,641 owners hold 147,384 in-scope parcels worth $203,329,346,149 on the roll between them, out of 71,641 owners with any in-scope parcel and 1,672,568 distinct owners on the whole roll. Ranking is over in-scope parcels only, so the owner-occupied half of the roll is not in this table

Owners ranked by estimated units over in-scope parcels
#Owner on the rollParcels in scopeAll parcels on the rollsUnits, estimatedMarket value in scopeCountiesRegistered agentRegistry
81US LIVING BULVERDE OAKS LLC23≈848$93,544,463Bexar, GuadalupeCAPITOL CORPORATE SERVICES INCMatched
82MORNINGSIDE NALLE 770 LLC 66≈827$146,000,000Bexar, TravisDAVID M STROSBERGMatched
83MIDAMERICA APARTMENTS LP CO MAA SCHILLINDER 01816822≈824$107,700,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
84STRATUS PROPERTIES INC1213≈824$225,149,426TravisCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANYMatched
85CORNER PATCH LTD2536≈823$193,918,195Bexar, Comal, KendallRANDAL C SMITHMatched
86BTJV PBR LLC CO ALTUS GROUP22≈817$118,336,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
87ARS2 APARTMENTS L L C22≈811$101,033,587TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
88TEXAS ESSENTIAL HOUSING PUBLIC77≈809$196,312,054Travisnot on the filingNo record
89DOMAIN MN OWNER LP33≈802$202,050,695TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
90LA COSTA BABAY LTD45≈800$86,536,350TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
91FDG TWO CREEKS LLC22≈788$110,000,000BexarMICHAEL M FULTON IIMatched
92SIMPSON ADDISON BURNET LLC22≈780$179,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
93ACC OP THE BLOCK LLC66≈775$189,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
94TPI HILLS LTD44≈765$163,553,859TravisREGIRED AGENT SOLUTIONS INCMatched
95BRIDGEHOLLOW APARTMENTS33≈763$100,420,000TravisNAPOLEON ZAVALAMatched
96TAP PALISADES PARK LLC33≈763$47,917,850BexarCT CORPORATION SYMMatched
97BMEF HIGHLANDS LIMITED PARTNERSHIP22≈757$160,370,000TravisCSCLAWYERS INCORPORATING SERVICE COMPANYMatched
98BAUSTIN VENTURES III LTD2324≈753$135,730,581TravisEDWARD G BLAINEMatched
99BELKORP HOLDINGS INC33≈748$175,940,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
100PROSE WOVER OWNER LP22≈744$102,352,060Bexarnot on the filingNo record
101CANTEBREA CROSSING TEXAS LLC22≈732$121,260,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
102AMHERST GROUP PROPERTIES LLC728735≈728$171,331,234Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, Medina, WilliamsonCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSCLAWYERS INCOMatched
103TMIF II AGAVE FALLS LP33≈728$113,195,464TravisREGIRED AGENTS INCMatched
104SUNDANCE S LTD SANDALWOOD66≈718$54,786,500Bexarnot on the filingNo record
105RPL WILDER LLC22≈713$132,000,000Bexar, TravisREGIRED AGENT SOLUTIONS INCMatched
106SREIT ESTATE ON QUARRY LAKE APARTMENTS LLC44≈704$156,080,000Bexar, TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
107DOMAIN NORTHSIDE RESIDENTIAL44≈702$122,005,574Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
108MFREVF IIISUR512 LP22≈700$133,510,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
109JACKSON APARTMENTS SA LLC33≈698$59,250,000BexarCOGENCY GLOBAL INCMatched
110SAN ANTONIO RWI35 STORAGE LLC78≈697$169,893,600Bexar, GuadalupeCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSCLAWYERS INCOMatched
111POST APARTMENT HOMES LP33≈694$142,994,000TravisNATIONAL REGIRED AGENTS INCMatched
112PURE PW S LLC22≈694$124,300,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
113RHP BLOCK 21 LLC1331≈691$502,275,462Bexar, TravisCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS INCOMatched
114PARK AT CRESTVIEW DENG LLC33≈690$90,462,474Bexar, TravisTHE KRAUS LAW FIRMMatched
115MCREF III EADO APARTMENTS LLC22≈687$157,740,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
1163001 ESPERANZA LP34≈680$168,999,721Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
117AURAMICH LLC22≈680$137,040,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
118FENTON TEXAS LLC2831≈679$163,284,071TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
119EILAN APARTMENTS OWNER LLC12≈675$108,500,000BexarREGIRED AGENT SOLUTIONS INCMatched
120KH SIGNATURE RIDGE OWNER LLC11≈672$73,975,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected

Unit counts are estimated from floor area · market value is the county roll value, not a sale price · the registry column is the owner's state, and a rejected lookup is not the same claim as no Texas filing · the table stops at the top 1,000 of 71,641; the CSV carries the rest

PreviousPage 3 of 25 · showing 1,000 of 71,641 ownersNext

Download this ranking as CSV

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,386 owners of the 71,641 inside the coverage rules, 35.4% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,841 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,414 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,641 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered