The biggest
landlords here

Ranked by what they hold inside the registry lookup scope. A row's parcel count is its in-scope parcels, not everything it owns, and the column beside it shows the difference

Rank by

Total market value · Estimated units · Parcels in scope

Nothing selected means every roll loaded
Comma separated. This is the building's ZIP, not the owner's mailing ZIP
Units, estimated
Market value
Year built
The whole roll includes owner-occupied homes and takes a few seconds to scan
Used by the rankings table only

71,570 owners match — out of the 71,570 owners holding at least one in-scope parcel. No filters applied, so this is the whole population

Those 71,570 owners hold 147,384 in-scope parcels worth $203,329,346,149 on the roll between them, out of 71,570 owners with any in-scope parcel and 1,669,160 distinct owners on the whole roll. Ranking is over in-scope parcels only, so the owner-occupied half of the roll is not in this table

Owners ranked by estimated units over in-scope parcels
#Owner on the rollParcels in scopeAll parcels on the rollsUnits, estimatedMarket value in scopeCountiesRegistered agentRegistry
241MFMG BURNET AUSTIN PROJECT OWNER LP11≈445$14,410,576Travisnot on the filingNo record
242CRPSRE LOYOLA LANE OWNER L P11≈444$53,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
243RIVER RAINEY VENTURE LLC11≈444$233,950,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
244C F INDIAN HOLLOW ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP CHURCHILL FORGE PROPS ATTN PATTY JARDIN11≈443$41,000,000Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
245LEGACY ON PARMER OWNER LLC11≈443$91,810,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
246SCHERTZ HOUSING AUTHORITY PUBLIC FACILITY COPORATION11≈443$20,839,510Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
247PROGRESS RESIDENTIAL BORROWER 19 LLC414414≈442$118,224,522Bastrop, Bexar, Comal, Guadalupe, Hays, Medina, Travis, Williamsonnot on the filingNo record
248ST ANDREWS EPISCOPAL SCHOOL27≈442$102,495,010Travisnot on the filingNo record
249TEXAS ESSENTIAL HOUSING PUBLIC FACILITY CORPORATION39≈442$50,193,693Bexarnot on the filingLookup rejected
250CA STUDENT LIVING AUSTIN III LLC11≈438$154,500,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
251FRANKLIN APARTMENT MANAGEMENT LTD55≈437$52,628,576Bexar, TravisAUBRA L FRANKLINMatched
252PR II GENESIS 80 RRS PHASE 2 LP11≈437$119,481,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
253RICHLAND PECAN STREET 1 LLC 12≈437$93,100,000TravisREGIRED AGENTS INCMatched
254RUGGIO THREE LLC1011≈437$49,972,776Hays, TravisROBERT RUGGIOMatched
25510422 HUEBNER TX OWNER LP11≈435$73,000,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
256VR VENTANA HOLDINGS LTD PARTNERSHIP11≈433$53,350,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
257GRAYCO SS LAND 2011 LP12≈430$106,500,000TravisJOHN J GRAY IIIMatched
258HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE COA33≈430$72,851,883Travisnot on the filingNo record
259KO SOUTH CONGRESS OWNER DE LLC11≈430$98,410,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
260CNCSWAGAT FOUR LP11≈429$79,883,020Comalnot on the filingNo record
261MONARCH BY WINDSOR LLC11≈429$163,500,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
262SONOMA VERDE SPE LP23≈429$53,400,000BexarCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS INCOMatched
263BMIRF RIM LLC CO ALTUS GROUP11≈428$86,900,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
264HILLTOP BRISTOL HEIGHTS11≈428$74,900,000Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
265LINDEN RIM GARDENS LP ET AL11≈428$63,000,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
266ONION CREEK APARTMENT PARTNERS11≈427$66,000,000Travisnot on the filingNo record
267VILLAS AT STONE OAK RANCH INVESTMENT GROUP11≈426$69,820,000TravisCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS INCOMatched
268OTH PRE FUND 1 LLC33≈425$61,833,330Bexar, TravisWILLIAM GOTTFRIEDMatched
269LCP MFII 5350 LLC22≈423$91,500,000TravisCAPITOL CORPORATE SERVICES INCMatched
270AUSTIN DMA HOUSING LLC810≈422$33,975,429TravisDIANA MCIVERMatched
271MMI TAU PROPCO LLC11≈422$90,000,000TravisREGIRED AGENT SOLUTIONS INCMatched
272ARSONTERRA LLC11≈421$73,500,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
273GS NORTH LAMAR APARTMENTS OWNER LP11≈421$14,928,248TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
274PURE MTPC S LLC RUM 455922012≈421$79,250,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record
275BMEF LAKEWAY LLC11≈417$84,750,000TravisCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS INCOMatched
276SAT 1 PROP CO LLC11≈417$59,800,000BexarCORPORATION SERVICE COMPANY DBA CSC LAWYERS IMatched
2774092 TPC LLC11≈413$70,682,860BexarJON TROESHMatched
278TDC GRIFFIN WINDSOR OWNER LLC13≈413$112,470,000TravisC T CORPORATION SYMMatched
279LC PFLUGERVILLE LLC12≈412$81,488,000Travisnot on the filingLookup rejected
280US REIF ARTESSA SAN ANTONIO TEXAS LLC22≈412$96,300,000Bexarnot on the filingNo record

Unit counts are estimated from floor area · market value is the county roll value, not a sale price · the registry column is the owner's state, and a rejected lookup is not the same claim as no Texas filing · the table stops at the top 1,000 of 71,570; the CSV carries the rest

PreviousPage 7 of 25 · showing 1,000 of 71,570 ownersNext

Download this ranking as CSV

How to read the end of a chain

A chain can end three ways, and the difference matters. Two of them are answers. One of them is a gap in what we know, and it is drawn as a gap so you never mistake it for an answer

Matched

The name on the roll lines up with a Texas business filing. We show both names side by side so you can reject a bad match yourself

25,374 owners of the 71,570 inside the coverage rules, 35.5% so far

No record

We searched and Texas has no business registration under this name. That is a finding, not a miss: plenty of rentals are held by a person or an out-of-state entity that never registered here. The line stops on a hard bar because the search finished

37,809 owners so far

No answer

No usable answer came back for this name. Almost all of these are lookups the registry rejected outright, which is our query failing, not Texas reporting that nothing is filed. That claim is the middle column, and this is not it. We do not know either way here, so the line trails off dashed and open

8,387 owners in scope: rejected lookup or never queried

One more case borrows that same dashed ending: a parcel outside the coverage rules. The registry was never asked about it, on purpose, so the chain is a gap here too, and the page names the rule that put it outside instead of implying an answer is on its way. 147,384 of the 2,117,593 parcels on the rolls are inside the rules

11.7%

of the 71,570 owners inside the coverage rules have no registry answer. The scrape has finished, so these are not owners waiting in a queue: almost all of them are lookups the registry rejected. Read them as unknown, never as unregistered